IUHPST/DLMPST

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
DIVISION OF LOGIC, METHODOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

BULLETIN No. 24

1 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ASSESSORS OF THE DIVISION, 2020–2023

Executive Committee:
  • President. Nancy Cartwright, Durham, United Kingdom & La Jolla, Calif., United States of America.
  • First Vice-President. Kim Sterelny, Canberra, Australia.
  • Second Vice-President. Verónica Becher, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Secretary-General. Benedikt Löwe, Hamburg, Germany & Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Treasurer Pierre Édouard Bour, Nancy, France.
  • Past President. Menachem Magidor, Jerusalem, Israel.

Assessors:

Hanne Andersen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Rachel Ankeny, Adelaide, Australia. Valeria de Paiva, Mountain View CA, U.S.A. Gerhard Heinzmann, Nancy, France. Concha Martinez Vidal, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Tomáš Marvan, Prague, Czech Republic. Dhruv Raina, Delhi, India. Cheng Sumei, Shanghai, China. Alasdair Urquhart, Toronto, Canada. Andrés Villaveces, Bogotá, Colombia.

Former Presidents: († = deceased)

Menachem Magidor (Israel), Elliott Sober (United States of America), Wilfrid Hodges (United Kingdom), Adolf Grünbaum† (United States of America), Michael Rabin (United States of America), Wesley Salmon† (United States of America), Jens-Erik Fenstad† (Norway), Lawrence J. Cohen† (United Kingdom), Dana S. Scott (United States of America), Jerzy Łoś† (Poland). Patrick Suppes† (United States of America), Jaakko Hintikka† (Finland & United States of America), Andrzej Mostowski† (Poland), Stephan Körner† (United Kingdom), Yehoshua Bar-Hillel† (Israel), Georg Henrik von Wright† (Finland), Stephen C. Kleene† (United States of America).

Former president Jens Erik Fenstad passed away on 14 April 2020.

The Executive Committee of the Division is composed of the President, the Vice-Presidents, the Secretary-General, the Treasurer, and the immediate Past President. The Council consists of the Executive Committee plus the Assessors.

2 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS (BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA, 24–29 JULY 2023)

2.1 Committees

Program Committee

  • Chair: Atocha Aliseda (Mexico City, Mexico & Madrid, Spain).
  • Representing the Executive Committee: Pierre Édouard Bour (Nancy, France).
  • Representing the Local Organising Committee: Eleonora Cresto (Buenos Aires, Argentina).
  • Secretary: María Martínez-Ordaz (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
  • Members: Jonas R. Becker Arenhart (Florinópolis, Brazil), Agnes Bolinska (Columbia SC, U.S.A.), Christina Brech (São Paulo, Brazil), Xavier de Donato (Santiago de Compostela, Spain), Igor Douven (Paris, France), Kevin Elliott (East Lansing MI, U.S.A.), Arantzazu Etxeberria Agiriano (San Sebastián, Spain), José Ferreirós (Sevilla, Spain), Mathias Frisch (Hannover, Germany), Adolfo García de la Sienra (Veracruz, Mexico), Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen (Oulu, Finland), Joan Leach (Canberra, Australia), Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh, U.S.A.), João Marcos (Natal, Brazil), Michela Massimi (Edinburgh, U.K.), Sara Negri (Genoa, Italy), Diana Inés Pérez (Buenos Aires, Argentina), Emma Ruttkamp-Bloem (Pretoria, South Africa), Sunil Easaw Simon (Kanpur, India), Sonja Smets (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), David Teira (Madrid, Spain), Obdulia Torres (Salamanca, Spain), Ambrosio Velasco Gómez (Mexico City, Mexico), Richard Zach (Calgary AB, Canada).

The Chair of the programme committee together with the representatives of the Executive Committee, and the Local Organising Committee formed the Core Team of the programme committee.

Local Organising Committee

Chair. Eleonora Cresto.

Members. Eduardo Barrio, Verónica Becher, Gustavo Bodanza, Bruno Borge, Manuela Busaniche, Alejandro Cassini, Nélida Gentile, Santiago Ginnobili, Eduardo N. Giovannini, Cecilia Hidalgo, Federico Holik, Catalina Hynes, Javier Legris, Diego Letzen, Bruno Lopes, Pablo Lorenzano, Hernán Miguel, Federico Pailos, Ricardo Rodriguez, Víctor Rodríguez, Ariel Jonathan Roffé, Luis Urtubey, Sandra Visokolskis.

Volunteer Coordinators. Bruno Da Ré, Damián Szmuc, Paula Teijeiro.

2.2 Programme structure

The special theme of the programme was “Science and values in an uncertain world”.

A. Logic
  • A.1 Mathematical Logic
  • A.2 Philosophical Logic
  • A.3 Computational Logic and Applications of Logic
  • A.4 Historical Aspects of Logic
B. General Philosophy of Science
  • B.1 Methodology
  • B.2 Formal Philosophy of Science and Formal Epistemology
  • B.3 Empirical and Experimental Philosophy of Science
  • B.4 Metaphysical Issues in the Philosophy of Science
  • B.5 Ethical, Social, and Political Issues in the Philosophy of Science
  • B.6 Historical Aspects in the Philosophy of Science
  • B.7 Educational Aspects of the Philosophy of Science
C. Philosophical Issues of Particular Disciplines
  • C.1 Philosophy of the Formal Sciences (including Logic, Mathematics, Statistics)
  • C.2 Philosophy of thae Physical Sciences (including Physics, Chemistry, Earth Science, Climate Science)
  • C.3 Philosophy of the Biological Sciences
  • C.4 Philosophy of the Biomedical and Health Sciences
  • C.5 Philosophy of the Cognitive and Behavioural Sciences
  • C.6 Philosophy of Computing and Computation
  • C.7 Philosophy of the Humanities and the Social Sciences
  • C.8 Philosophy of the Applied Sciences and Technology
  • C.9 Philosophy of Emerging and Interdisciplinary Sciences

3 UNCONFIRMED MINUTES OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF IUHPST/DLMPST IN BUENOS AIRES ON 27 JULY 2023

Ordinary Members Present (number of votes and names of delegates in parentheses; total votes: 68 before Agenda item 5; 69 after Agenda item 5). Argentina (2; 1 after Agenda item 5; Víctor Rodríguez), Australia (3; Pamela Robinson), Austria (1; Georg Schiemer), Belgium (1; Peter Verdée), Brazil (2; Elaine Pimentel), Canada (3; Zeyad El Nabolsy), P. R. China (3; Chen Bo), Czech Republic (2; Libor Behounek, Robin Kopecký), Denmark (2; Magdalena Malecka), Estonia (1; Peeter Müürsepp), Finland (2; Uskali Müki), France (4; Andrew Arana, Paola Cantu, Karine Chemla, Gerhard Heinzmann), Germany (4; Benedikt Löwe), Iran (1; Benedikt Löwe), Italy (4; Daniele Molinini), Japan (4; Mitsuhiro Okada), Republic of Korea (2; Insok Ko), Mexico (2; Atocha Aliseda, Ambrosio Velasco-Gómez), The Netherlands (2; Benedikt Löwe), Poland (2; Piotr Błaszczyk), Romania (1; Sorin Costreie), Russian Federation (3; Ilya Kasavin, Andrei Rodin, Lada Shipovalova), South Africa (1; Sean Muller), Spain (2; José A. Díez Calzada), Sweden (3; Valentin Goranko), Taiwan (2; Husan-Chih Lin, Kok-Yong Lee), United Kingdom (4; Robin Hendry), and United States of America (5; Hasok Chang, Philip Kircher, Helen Longino). After Agenda item 5, the number of votes of Argentina was reduced to 1 and the new Ordinary Member Portugal (2; João Luis Cordovil, Joan Bertran-San-Millán) was admitted; therefore, the number of votes of ordinary members increased by one.

Ordinary Members Absent. Eire (cf. Agenda item 5), Hungary (1), India (1), Israel (1), Moldova (1), New Zealand (2), Norway (1).

International Members Present (total votes: 25). Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences (2; Michel Ghins, Jure Zovko), Association Computability in Europe (1; Giuseppe Primiero), Association for Symbolic Logic (6; Juliet Floyd), Association for the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (1; Marco Panza), Charles S. Peirce Society (1; Javier Legris). European Philosophy of Science Association (2; Alberto Naibo), Association for Logic, Language and Information (2; Valentin Goranko, Benedikt Löwe), Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsphilosophie (2; Paul Hoyningen-Huene), Institut Wiener Kreis (2; Georg Schiemer), Polskie Towarzystwo Logiki i Filozofii Nauki (1; Cezary Cieśliński), Scandinavian Logic Society (1; Valentin Goranko), Société de Philosophie des Sciences (4; Alberto Naibo).

Commissions Present (total votes: 4). Commission on the Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (1; Juan Manuel Durán), History and Philosophy of Computation (1; Giuseppe Primiero), International Association for Science and Cultural Diversity (1; Madeline Muntersbjorn), Joint Commission (1; Agnes Bolinska).

Commissions Absent. Commission on Arabic Logic (1), Inter-Division Teaching Commission (1).

Membership Candidates Present. Portugal (2; João Luis Cordovil, Joan Bertran-San-Millán).

Others. According to tradition, the General Assembly was open to all participants of CLMPST 2023. The Division for History of Science and Technology (DHST/IUHPST) was represented by DHST President Marcos Cueto (Brazil).

Total number of votes present. 97 before Agenda item 5; 98 after Agenda item 5. The total number of votes was 109, both before and after Agenda item 5. Therefore, the number of votes present was at least half of of the valid voting power and thus the General Assembly was validly constituted according to Article 15 of the Division's statutes.

Agenda item 1 Opening and confirmation of the agenda

The General Assembly took place in Auditorium 1 of the School of Economics of the University of Buenos Aires in Buenos Aires, Argentina. After verification of the delegates and distribution of the paper ballots, the Secretary General opened the Assembly at 4:30pm. The Secretary General apologised on behalf of the other five members of the DLMPST Executive Committee who were not able to attend and assumed the chair for the General Assembly. The agenda was presented and unanimously confirmed by the Assembly:
  • 1. Opening and confirmation of the agenda.
  • 2. Confirmation of the minutes of the 2019 General Assembly.
  • 3. Report by the President and the Secretary General.
  • 4. Report by the Treasurer.
  • 5. Membership Issues.
  • 6. Commission Issues.
  • 7. Election of the next Council.
  • 8. Proposed changes of the Statutes of IUHPST.
  • 9. Proposed changes of the Statutes of DLMPST.
  • 10. Procedure for Council Nominations.
  • 11. CLMPST XVIII in 2027.
  • 12. Delegation of responsibilities to the Executive Committee.
  • 13. Any other business.

Nina Atanasova and Sara Uckelman were unanimously approved by the Assembly as tellers for all votes with paper ballots cast. The Secretary General announced that, as for the 2019 General Assembly, Giuseppe Primiero was taking notes during the Assembly; he gave an overview of the voting rules for the Assembly and the use of the distributed paper ballots.

Agenda item 2 Confirmation of the minutes of the 2019 General Assembly

The minutes of the previous General Assembly (Prague 2019) had been made available on the Division's website and published in print as part of the DLMPST Bulletin No. 23 in the journal Mathematical Logic Quarterly (Vol. 65, Issue 4, 2019, pp. 394–406) in unconfirmed form. The ordinary member France reminds the Assembly that the ordinary member France and the international member Societé de Philosophie des Sciences had submitted a proposal for changes to the nomination procedure of the Division which was mentioned under Agenda item 8 of the 2019 minutes. The ordinary member France requested that their proposal be quoted verbatim in the minutes. The Secretary General proposed that both the mentioned proposal and the subsequent report of the ad hoc committee on nominations (cf. Agenda item 10) be included as part of DLMPST Bulletin No. 24 (these documents can be found in § 7 of this Bulletin). After this proposal, the Assembly unanimously approved the confirmation of the minutes.

Agenda item 3 Report by the President and the Secretary General

A written version of the joint report of the President and the Secretary General had been made available to the delegates in advance and various items of the written report were highlighted during the General Assembly. The entire text of the report is printed in these minutes.

The Secretary General remembered ten past Council members of the Division who passed away between the 2019 congress in Prague and the 2023 congress in Buenos Aires: Gerald E. Sacks (1933–4 October 2019; Assessor 1975–1979), Mario Bunge (21 September 1919–24 February 2020; Assessor 1969–1971), Jens-Erik Fenstad (15 April 1935–14 April 2020; Treasurer 1975–1983; PC chair CLMPS 1987; President 1991–1995), Karen Neander (24 March 1954–6 May 2020; Assessor 2012–2015), David Hugh Mellor (10 July 1938–21 June 2020; Assessor 1983–1987), Michael Redhead (30 December 1929–31 August 2020; Assessor 1995–1999), Margaret C. Morrison (19 May 1954–9 January 2021; Assessor 2004–2007), Peter Clark (3 March 1948–18 August 2021; Secretary General 2008–2010), Graham Nerlich (23 November 1929–31 March 2022; Assessor 1987–1991), and Ian Hacking (18 February 1936–10 May 2023; Alternate Assessor 1979–1983). The Assembly stood in silence in memory of the deceased.

General remarks

The Council term from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2023 was very different from what was expected when the current Council was elected at the General Assembly in Prague in August 2019.

The previous term (2016–2019) had seen an unprecedented amount of travel, in particular in relationship to the merger of ICSU and ISSC to the new International Science Council (ISC) with an extraordinary General Assembly and two General Assemblies within less than two years, all conducted as in-person meetings. As a result of this increase in international travel, the Executive Committee budgeted for large amounts of travel expenses in the new term (2020–2023).

Once the new Council started its term, the Covid-19 pandemic hit the world, stopped international travel and replaced it with virtual alternatives to the great benefit of the environment; when international travel resumed, many institutions reflected on the necessity of in-person meetings and many have decided that it is a moral obligation to reduce in-person meetings to those that are absolutely and structurally necessary.

As a consequence, the entire Council term 2020–2023 was a term of virtual and electronic interactions with hardly any travel. This was considered a very positive development: while the Executive Committee acknowledged a certain amount of sad melancholy about the lack of in-person interactions, they think that many of the in-person meetings of the (recent) past are unjustifiable in light of the existence of virtual alternatives.

Internal matters

The Executive Committee during the term 2020–2023 consisting of the President, the two Vice Presidents, the Past President, the Secretary General, and the Treasurer had regular e-mail discussions. There were no in-person or virtual meetings of the Executive Committee.

The Council, consisting of the members of the Executive Committee and the ten Assessors had planned a physical meeting in Buenos Aires in the year 2021: this meeting was thwarted by the global Covid-19 pandemic. There was a virtual Council meeting held on 12 November 2021, to which the chairs of the organising and programme committee of CLMPST 2023 as well as the Secretary General of DHST were invited.

Relationship with members

As reported at the last General Assembly, the Executive Committee has started during the last two Council terms (2012–2015 & 2016–2019) to increase engagement with the membership by the Small conference grant scheme and by directly involving the membership in the Council elections. During the last General Assembly, two of the Division's members, the ordinary member France and the international member Societé de Philosophie des Sciences had proposed a formalised system of Council nominations and elections to further increase membership engagement. At the 2019 General Assembly, Council had promised to make this the topic of a membership consultation to propose a future nomination procedure.

An ad hoc committee on nominations, consisting of Verónica Becher, Chen Bo, Jen Davoren, Valeria Giardino, Benedikt Löwe, and Alasdair Urquhart was created on 18 March 2022; the committee designed a questionnaire which was sent to the membership and commissions on 3 February 2023. The outcome of the consultation gave the Executive Committee a clear steer to formulate a nomination policy largely based on current practices that is agreed on by the General Assembly (cf. Agenda item 10 and § 7).

At the same time, the Executive Committee continued its efforts to increase membership engagement in the election process by inviting all member organisations and commissions to submit recommendations for nominations. Many members submitted recommendations and in total, forty recommendations were received. Of these, three agreed to be nominated for officer positions and 32 more agreed to be nominated as Assessors. The election procedure (approval voting with no fixed maximum of Assessors elected) was chosen to guarantee that everyone willing to contribute to the Division's governance who has support of the General Assembly will be able to do so, using the flexibility given to the Division by its statutes (no maximum number of Assessors). Cf. Agenda item 7.

The IUHPST

The Division is one of the two Divisions of the International Union of History and Philosophy of Science and Technology (IUHPST). The governance of the Union is determined by the IUHPST statutes and a Memorandum of Cooperation between its two Divisions, the DLMPST and the Division for History of Science and Technology (DHST). The Memorandum is available on the DLMPST webpage. The statutes determine that the Presidency of the Union rotates between the DLMPST President and the DHST President. The following were the officers of the Union in the past four years:

  2020 & 2021 2022 & 2023
IUHPST President Michael Osborne Nancy Cartwright
  DHST President DLMPST President
IUHPST Vice President Menachem Magidor Marcos Cueto
  DLMPST President DHST President
IUHPST Secretary General Catherine Jami Benedikt Löwe
  DHST Secretary General DLMPST Secretary General
IUHPST Treasurer Milada Sekyrková Pierre Édouard Bour
  DHST Treasurer DLMPST Treasurer
 

 

The Secretary General used this opportunity to ask Marcos Cueto, the DHST President, to deliver words of greeting from the sister Division. The DHST President announced that the next International Congress of History of Science and Technology (ICHST) will be held in Dunedin, New Zealand and virtually from 29 June to 5 July 2025.

The IUHPST statutes before the General Assembly determined that the IUHPST Board consists of four members, asymmetrically selected from the officers of the two Divisions: at each point in time, one of the Divisions will have three Board members (President, Secretary General, and Treasurer) and the other Division only one (Vice President). The two Divisions aimed to symmetrise the IUHPST Board by including the President, Secretary General, and Treasurer of both Divisions. In 2020, Marcos Cueto (at the time, DHST President Elect) and Benedikt Löwe drafted a change of IUHPST Statutes which was agreed on by the DHST Council on 6 December 2020 and by the DLMPST Council on 12 November 2021; the changes were accepted by the DHST General Assembly on 28 July 2021 (planned to be held in Prague, but run virtually due to the Covid-19 pandemic). Cf. Agenda item 8.

As established in the Memorandum, the Divisions send a representative to the Council meetings and General Assemblies of the other Division. DLMPST was represented by Benedikt Löwe at DHST Council meetings on 7 December 2019 (Prague), 5 & 6 December 2020, 1 August 2021, 10 December 2021, 9 December 2022, and 22 June 2023 (all virtual) and at the DHST General Assemblies on 28 & 31 July 2021 (virtual); it was represented by Verónica Becher at the DHST Council meeting on 24 July 2021 (virtual). DHST was represented by Liesbeth De Mol at the virtual DLMPST Council meeting on 12 November 2021 and by Marcos Cueto at the General Assembly in Buenos Aires on 27 July 2023.

During the last term, the DLMPST and the DHST shared four inter-division commissions: History and Philosophy of Computing (HaPoC), the International Association for Science and Cultural Diversity (IASCUD), the Inter-Division Teaching Commission (IDTC), and the Joint Commission (JC). The Joint Commission has a special status and is governed by the Memorandum. Its chair is appointed by DLMPST in the year of CLMPST and the preceding year and by DHST in the year of ICHST and the preceding year. For 2022 and 2023, DLMPST appointed Agnieszka Bolinska as JC chair. The JC continued the successful IUHPST Essay Prize in History and Philosophy of Science. Cf. Agenda item 6.

The successful project The Gender Gap in Science (where IUHPST was one of the partners) resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding of several Unions on Gender Equality in Science. This MoU, co-signed by the International Mathematical Union (IMU), the International Union for Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP), the International Council for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM), the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS), and IUHPST created the Standing Committee for Gender Equality in Science (SCGES). IUHPST is represented by Catherine Jami from DHST who is also the chair of the committee; DLMPST provides a deputy: this was Delia Kesner from 2020 to 2021 and is now Hanne Andersen (since 2021). During the final conference of the Gender Gap project ICTP in Trieste in 2019, the project co-leader, Meihung Chiu, was denied access to ICPT since she is from Taiwan. On 10 January 2020, IUHPST wrote in protest against this discriminatory policy to the International Science Council and received a reply from ISC President Daya Reddy on 16 January 2020.

The years 2022 & 2023 were designated the International Year for Basic Sciences & Sustainable Development (IYBSSD), coordinated by the International Union of Pure & Applied Physics (IUPAP). IUHPST is one of the IYBSSD partner unions and is represented on the IYBSSD Steering Committee by Benedikt Löwe.

Currently, there is an initiative by IUPAP to create an International Year for Quantum Science & Technology (IYQST) in 2025; this initiative has obtained the support of the UNESCO Executive Board (216 EX/37). In July 2023, IUHPST has agreed to endorse the initiative and has nominated Sonja Smets to serve as a member of the International Advisory Board for IYQST.

The Gruber Foundation awards the annual Gruber Cosmology Prize and has a representative of IUHPST on its advisory board. On 20 September 2022, the IUHPST Board nominated Jeremy Butterfield to serve on the Gruber Cosmology Prize Board for a three year term, renewable once.

Relationship with ISC

The IUHPST has been a member of the International Council for Science (ICSU) since 1955 and is a founding member of the merged International Science Council (ISC). At the last General Assembly, it was reported that Craig Callender had been appointed as an IUHPST representative on the the Committee for Freedom and Responsibility in Science (CFRS), one of the four statutory ISC committees. When their first term came to an end in 2021, IUHPST nominated one candidate for each of the four committees. Of these, ISC appointed Sandra Mitchell to the Committee for Science Planning (CSP) and Jahnavi Phalkey (a member of the DHST Council) to the the Committee for Outreach and Engagement (COE), each for three-year terms from 2021 to 2024.

The ISC held three General Assemblies during the last four years, all virtual. IUHPST was represented at the Extraordinary General Assembly in January 2021 by Catherine Jami and Benedikt Löwe and at the General Assembly in October 2021 by Marcos Cueto, Catherine Jami, and Benedikt Löwe. Only those two General Assemblies had a live videoconference component, the third (Extraordinary) General Assembly in May 2023 was an online vote where Benedikt Löwe was the voting delegate of IUHPST.

A working group, co-facilitated by the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and the International Science Council (ISC), had been tasked with developing new hazard definitions and classifications. In October 2019, the working group asked for input from stakeholders to ensure that their list was robust and reflected the full spectrum of local and regional terminology. IUHPST identified philosophers of science working on the concept of risk and requested that they fill in the consultation questionnaire.

The ISC World Data System (WDS) is an initiative of the ISC that aims to preserve quality assured scientific data and information, to facilitate open access, and to promote the adoption of uniform standards. WDS aims to have a liaison for the ISC union members. In October 2019, IUHPST appointed Sabina Leonelli as the WDS liaison of the Union. Related to this, CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data created a task group on Digital Representation of Units of Measure (DRUM) and IUHPST appointed Sabina Leonelli as the contact person for this task group in September 2020. During the last four years, WDS had two nomination rounds for their Scientific Committee. IUHPST nominated two candidates in November 2019 and one candidate in May 2021, neither of which was appointed.

One of the major ISC endeavours of the last few years was a discussion about the future of scientific publishing. Virtual consultations were held as part of this project in July 2020 and January 2021, during which Benedikt Löwe represented IUHPST.

Another ISC committee, the Small Islands and Developing States Liaison Committee (SIDS) was asking for nominations of members; IUHPST unsuccessfully nominated a member in December 2019.

ISC also started a new Fellowship programme in which individuals are recognised for their outstanding contributions to the promotion of science as a global public good. The Fellowship is the highest honour that can be conferred on an individual by the International Science Council. In 2022, IUHPST unsuccessfully co-nominated two individuals for an ISC Fellowship (one with the national ISC member New Zealand and one with CIPSH). Nominations for ISC Fellowships remain active for three years; both of the nominations were successful in the 2023 nomination round (to be reported on in Bulletin No. 25).

In general, the ISC greatly improved their membership engagement: e.g., on 13 February 2020, Catherine Jami and Benedikt Löwe had a joint virtual meeting with ISC staff to discuss what IUHPST considers important about their ISC membership. In May 2023, the ISC implemented a system of Regional Focal Points, people who act as liaison for the ISC Regional Offices. IUHPST nominated Takehiko Hashimoto and Mitsuhiro Okada for the Regional Office Asia-Pacific, Marcos Cueto and Eleonora Cresto for the Regional Office Latin America, and Don Ross for the Regional Office Africa.

Relationship with CIPSH

DLMPST is a member of the Conseil International de Philosophie et des Sciences Humaines (CIPSH); in this council, DLMPST and DHST are separately members as opposed to the ISC where the Union is a member. Both DLMPST and DHST have been very active in CIPSH during the last four years: the former Secretary General of DHST, Catherine Jami, is currently one of the Vice Presidents of CIPSH, CIPSH and DLMPST jointly coordinate the UNESCO World Logic Day (WLD; see below), furthermore, our Japanese National Committee will host the CIPSH General Assembly in Tokyo in August 2023.

In 2017, Benedikt Löwe had become the representative of DLMPST on the CIPSH Executive Committee; he was re-nominated in 2020 and 2023 and represented the interests of DLMPST within the Council. In the 2020 and 2023 elections, DLMPST also nominated Luiz Oosterbeek for the office of President of CIPSH.

The CIPSH General Assembly (originally planned in Odense, Denmark) was held virtually on 14 & 15 December 2020. DLMPST was represented by Benedikt Löwe. The General Assembly in August 2023 took place as a hybrid event in Tokyo a month after the DLMPST General Assembly in Buenos Aires; Rachel Ankeny represented DLMPST in person and Benedikt Löwe represented DLMPST virtually. There was also a conference held in Tokyo after the General Assembly where Rachel Ankeny represented DLMPST.

In 2018, CIPSH had announced a new programme of so-called CIPSH Chairs, modelled after the programme of UNESCO Chairs, but focused on the humanities. One of these chairs was created at the Universität Hamburg under the name Diversity of Mathematical Research Cultures and Practices (DMRCP) with Benedikt Löwe as the chair-holder (September 2021 to September 2026, renewable).

Shortly after the Division's last General Assembly in 2019, an unexpected development took place: there was a motion for the 40th UNESCO General Conference to declare 14 January to become UNESCO World Logic Day (WLD). UNESCO coordinated the proposal with CIPSH who involved DLMPST as the natural institution to be responsible for the endeavour. On 26 November 2019, the motion was successful and in 2020, CIPSH took responsibility for World Logic Day. The CIPSH Board created the positions of WLD Coordinator and WLD Assistant Coordinator and appointed Benedikt Löwe and Deniz Sarikaya to these positions for a three year term, respectively. The global Covid-19 pandemic changed the character of WLD substantially: the overwhelming majority of WLD events are virtual and open for everyone around the globe.

The first CIPSH-coordinated WLD on 14 January 2021 included video messages from the ISC President Daya Reddy and several DLMPST representatives (Past President Menachem Magidor, Second Vice President Verónica Becher, Assessors Valeria de Paiva and Andrés Villaveces, and Mitsuhiro Okada, representative of the Division's Japanese National Committee). The WLD Coordinator and Assistant Coordinator also provided the institutional foundations for WLD 2022 and 2023. The coordination arrangements for WLD have been re-examined in 2023 and a cooperation agreement between CIPSH and DLMPST has been drafted, creating a WLD Advisory Panel. This agreement was approved by the Executive Committee on 18 July 2023 and is currently awaiting approval from the CIPSH Board and endorsement of the CIPSH General Assembly in August 2023. Deniz Sarikaya has been recommended by the Executive Committee to CIPSH as the next WLD Coordinator.

CIPSH organised the European Humanities Conference in May 2021. The event was mostly virtual, but had a significant in-person component in Lisbon. Benedikt Löwe served on the programme committee for that event and participated as a panel member in a panel entitled Multidisciplinary Dynamics as Education and R&D strategies for meaningful problem solving. For this conference, CIPSH asked for reflections on the topics of debate: DLMPST Assessors Hanne Andersen and Rachel Ankeny provided a reflection document on 1 February 2021 that can be found on the DLMPST website.

Other activities

In 2013, 2014, 2017, and 2018, the DLMPST offered small conference grants to organisers of events proposed by the members. The intention was to do this again in 2021 and 2022, but the Covid-19 pandemic created so much uncertainty that these grants were not advertised during this Council term. The Executive Committee felt that grants that are mainly aiming at encouraging academic travel to conferences are not appropriate anymore and some re-thinking of the grant scheme is in order: the next Executive Committee is encouraged to do so.

DLMPST co-organised a meeting entitled Fairness, Integrity and Transparency in Formal Systems: Challenges for a Society Increasingly Dominated by Technology with the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science (JAPS). That meeting was originally planned for the summer of 2020, then postponed and ultimately held as a mostly virtual event on 19 June 2021.

DLMPST was and is one of the non-financial sponsors of the tenth Congress of the Spanish Society of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (X SLMFCE) held in Salamanca, 16–19 November 2021 and the triennial conference SILFS 2023: Logic, Philosophy of Science, & Global Challenges that was scheduled to be held in Urbino, 4–7 September 2023.

For the World Humanities Report, Nancy Cartwright and Benedikt Löwe wrote a short text in July 2020 entitled Intermediaries between the Two Cultures. Similarly, they wrote a statement on the occasion of World Philosophy Day 2021 on 18 November 2021. Both of these documents can be found on the DLMPST website.

The International Association of Physics Students organised an online event on Philosophy and Ethics in Physics for students and asked the DLMPST to provide speakers. Craig Callender and Benedikt Löwe attended this virtual event and gave talks in August 2020.

On 27 & 28 November 2020, the Russian Society for History and Philosophy of Science (RSHPS) organised its Second Congress and Benedikt Löwe delivered words of greeting on behalf of the DLMPST.

The DLMPST Executive Committee was asked whether the DLMPST wanted to co-sign the Jena Declaration on the necessity of a move “from talking about sustainability to living sustainably”. The Executive Committee decided that while the members as individuals supported the declaration, the topic was not within the expertise of the DLMPST and it was therefore not appropriate to sign it as an institution.

The sister division DHST is organising the Global History of Science and Technology Festival 2023 as a virtual event on 29 September 2023 and asked the Division to nominate a speaker for it. The Division nominated Sara Uckelman as speaker.

In July 2023, DLMPST took institutional responsibility for the LOGIC mailing list. This mailing list had existed since the year 2000, maintained by various institutions in informal arrangements; on 19 July 2023, the DLMPST Executive Committee adopted a document with regulations and agreements and appointed Deniz Sarikaya as moderator of the list for a (renewable) term of four years. The LOGIC list is generously supported by the Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC) of the Universiteit van Amsterdam which provides the webspace and some automation facilities.

CLMPS XVI proceedings volume

The proceedings of CLMPST XVI in Prague (Czech Republic) were published as

Tomáš Marvan, Hanne Andersen, Hasok Chang, Benedikt Löwe, and Ivo Pezlar (eds.). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Bridging Across Academic Cultures. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Congress. College Publications, London 2022.

 

The volume is freely available online on the DLMPST website.

CLMPST XVII in Buenos Aires

The seventeenth congress was held at the School of Economics of the University of Buenos Aires; the chair of the Local Organising Committee was Eleonora Cresto, the chair of the Programme Committee was Atocha Aliseda (Mexico). Atocha Aliseda, Eleonora Cresto and Pierre Édouard Bour formed the Core Group within the Programme Committee that dealt with executive decisions. Upon proposal of the Core Group, the Council decided that the theme of CLMPST XVII should be
a theme that highlights the importance of philosophy of science in the overall discourse about the use of science and technology.

At this congress, this tradition was continued with an ISC-DLMPST joint symposium on Assessment of Research and Knowledge that was held on 24 July 2023. Four of the Division's six Commissions are organising symposia at the congress in Buenos Aires. The publication of the proceedings of CLMPST XVII is planned as a volume entitled Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Congress, Science and Values in an Uncertain World with College Publications.

The Assembly explicitly thanked the members of the organising and programme committee of CLMPST 2023 for their work in arranging the congress.

Agenda item 4 Treasurer's Report

A written version of the Treasurer's report had been made available to the delegates in advance. The Treasurer had recorded a video with his presentation which was played to the Assembly. The entire text of the report is printed in these minutes; the tables can be found in § 4.

Although the DLMPST has two bank accounts, one in US dollars and one in euros, all financial figures in the report were given in US dollars, as was customary (cf. Agenda item 5 for the decision about changing this custom). Since the last Treasurer's report in 2019, the assets of the Division have regularly increased, and even the financial contribution to CLMPST in 2023 shall not reverse this trend. This is mainly due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and the way it has impacted all academic activities, and those of the Division as well. But this event, which caused a massive reduction of our expenses, hides the fact that the Division's income has also increased, due to the arrival of new ordinary and international members since 2019: it is now around USD 18,000 p.a., rather than the USD 15,000 mentioned in previous reports. It should be emphasised that this situation of good financial health is unusual: the previous two Executive Committees (2012–2019) initiated a gradual reduction of our assets investing this amount in productive activities. They budgeted expenses of approximately USD 15,000 (over four years) above the expected income. The current Executive Committee decided on 10 March 2020 to continue with this policy. With expected income of USD 70,000 over four years, the four-year budget was set to USD 85,000 and unanimously approved by the Executive Committee on 14 April 2020. On 8 June 2020, EUR 600 = USD 650 were added to this budget for the contribution to the Standing Committee for Gender Equality in Science (SCGES).

DLMPST Four-Year Budget 2020–2023.  
Fixed costs USD 12,000
Travel expenses USD 12,000
Congress support USD 20,000
Commission support USD 24,000
Council meeting USD 6,000
Small conference grants USD 10,000
IYBSSD 2022 USD 1,000
SCGES USD 650
Total USD 85,650
 

 

The fact that there were no in-person meetings in 2020 and 2021 and that most international coordination meetings were moved to the virtual world (to the great benefit of the environment), the amount of travel expenses was greatly reduced, the small conference grants programme was not used during this term, the Council meeting was not held in person, but virtually at no cost, and for several years, the Commissions did not organise any events and received lower amounts of support.

With regard to the future budget for the next four years, the Treasurer suggested that some thought could be given to the type of productive activities to be financed. It may be that the organization of virtual scientific events (conferences or institutional meetings) will become the norm, and the Division might have to explore other ways of supporting research in the fields within the Division's scope.

As shown in the tables, the Division's most stable expenses (bank charges, web hosting, subscription to ISC, CIPSH, etc.) have remained unchanged. There were no travel expenses nor conference grants between 2020 and 2022, which also allowed the Division to allocate a supplementary amount to the Congress support. As to the Commissions funding, the Division's expenses remained below the forecasts, in particular because two of the commissions received no or almost no funds.

Concerning membership fees, as noted in previous reports, payments are not always made regularly on an annual basis. Sometimes members only pay after several reminders, and occasionally retroactively for several years. The unit of subscription has been USD 150 since 1997. In the last four years, at least two thirds of membership payments were made in Euro. In order to avoid massive fluctuations of the annual fees for the members, it was decided a while ago to fix the unit in Euros as EUR 135. While this means that the members paying in Euro have fixed fees, it resulted in wildly fluctuating income due to the exchange rate changes.

Since a large majority of members pay in Euros, it was proposed to the General Assembly to change the price of the unit subscription from USD 150 to EUR 150 and calculate the price in USD at the exchange rate on the 1st of January of the year of subscription and noted that this means a very modest increase in fee (at the time of the General Assembly, EUR 150 corresponded to USD 163). It was emphasised that the unit subscription price had last been changed in 1997 and the purchase power has dropped by about 70% in these twenty-six years. Cf. Agenda item 5 (5).

Until 2020, the Division's financial statements were certified by a former law officer, Wolf-Dieter Gutmann, who sadly passed away. The Executive Committee decided that the Treasurer would be responsible for validating this financial report, on the basis of the same pieces usually provided to Mr. Gutmann, and following the same process.

The Assembly expressed concern with the current procedure of self-certification by the Treasurer and suggested a return to an external audit which would not have to be done annually, but should be done before the next Treasurer's report in 2027. The new Executive Committee, elected later at this General Assembly, was charged with implementing this.

Agenda item 5 Membership Issues

The Secretary General reported that the ordinary member Croatia resigned their membership on 13 July 2022. There were five decisions to be made by the General Assembly under this agenda item:
  • (1) On 24 April 2020, the Royal Irish Academy informed DLMPST that they are unable to pay their fees. The letter does not explicitly state that Eire is resigning their membership, but it talks about “withdrawing from certain unions”. The Assembly confirmed unanimously by acclamation that this letter is interpreted as a resignation letter and that Eire's membership is therefore terminated with effect of 24 April 2020. This decision reduced the maximal number of votes of ordinary members by one.
  • (2) On 2 June 2021, the Centre for Philosophy of Sciences of the University of Lisbon applied for ordinary membership for Portugal in category B. The Executive Committee made Portugal a Candidate Member and recommended the acceptance of Portugal as an ordinary member in category B to the Assembly. The Assembly unanimously accepted Portugal's application for ordinary membership in category B by acclamation. This decision increased the number of votes of ordinary members by two. The new ordinary member Portugal received its ballot booklet.
  • (3) On 12 September 2022, the ordinary member Argentina requested to change its category from B to A for economic reasons. The Assembly unanimously accepted Argentina's category change by acclamation. This decision reduced the number of votes of ordinary members by one.
  • (4)

    The Iranian Research Institute of Philosophy (IRIP) informed DLMPST that they wished to take responsibility for the National Committee of the ordinary member Iran, pay the membership fee, and request a category change from A to C. At the time of the General Assembly, this was only a declaration of intent since IRIP needed government approval for this. The Secretary General asked the Assembly to accept the change of responsibility and category change conditionally upon receipt of the official request letter. After some discussion, the Assembly gave conditional approval and delegated the task of accepting the changes to the Executive Committee by acclamation.

    [Remark (added in December 2023). The official letter was received by the Executive Committee on 6 August 2023 and the Executive Committee accepted the change of responsibility and category effective 16 August 2023, as delegated by the Assembly.]

  • (5) As reported in Agenda item 4, the Treasurer had proposed a change of the currency of the unit of subscription from USD to EUR and to set the unit of subscription to EUR 150, effective 1 January 2024 and that the subscription rate in USD would be calculated based on the exchange rate on 1 January of the subscription year. The Assembly approved this proposal unanimously by acclamation.

After these decisions, the voting power of the ordinary member Argentina was reduced to one vote and the new ordinary member Portugal had two votes. Therefore, the voting power of the Assembly increased from 97 votes to 98 votes.

Agenda item 6 Commission Issues

The Secretary General reminded the Assembly that the annual reports of the Commissions can be found on the DLMPST website.

Joint Commission and IUHPST Essay Prize

The Chair of the Joint Commission reported on the IUHPST Essay Prize which was awarded in 2021 and 2023.

The prize question of the 2021 IUHPST Essay Prize was “What can history and philosophy of science, technology and medicine contribute to our current global challenges?”. The panel of judges for the 2021 competition consisted of Rachel Ankeny, Agnes Bolinska, Hasok Chang (chair), Benedikt Löwe, Helen Longino, Joseph Martin, Michael Osborne, and Dirk Schlimm; the submission deadline was 15 January 2021. The winner of the 2021 prize was the essay entitled “Misinformation age: What early modern scientific fakes can tell us about today's online fabrications” by Marlis Hinckley of Johns Hopkins University. Hinckley received her prize and presented the content of the essay in a special session at the online ICHST in July 2021.

The prize question of the 2023 IUHPST Essay Prize was “How can history and philosophy of science, technology, and medicine help us to understand and evaluate the role of values in science?”. The panel of judges for the 2023 competition consisted of Agnes Bolinska (chair), Marlis Hinckley, Helen Longino, and Joseph Martin; the submission deadline was 15 January 2023. The winner of the 2023 prize was the essay entitled “The curatorial view of assessment and the ethics of scientific advice: Beyond decisional autonomy towards distributive epistemic justice” by Ahmad Elabbar of the University of Cambridge. Elabbar presented his essay at CLMPST 2023 in Buenos Aires. The panel of judges was also pleased to recognize the essay “Beyond democratic legitimacy of value-judgments in science: a closer look at science in the early Soviet Union” by Karoliina Pulkkinen of the University of Helsinki as the runner-up.

Re-commissioning

The Executive Committee gave a report on the activities and functioning of the existing six commissions. It reported that there have been issues with the Inter-Division Commission on Teaching (IDTC) since at least 2015: disputes around governance issues and resignations of officers have resulted in a commission that cannot serve its important role within the Division. Furthermore, the Executive Committee reported that all members of the commission on Arabic Logic have resigned and that there are currently no members of the commission.

The Executive Committee proposed to the Assembly to re-commission the following commissions for the term of 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2027:
  • (1) the Commission for History and Philosophy of Computing (HaPoC),
  • (2) the International Association for Science and Cultural Diversity (IASCUD),
  • (3) the DHST/DLMPST Joint Commission (JC), and
  • (4) the Commission on the Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (CoPhiTES).

It was emphasised that this proposal means that the other two commissions (the Inter-Division Teaching Commission and the Commission on Arabic Logic) are not re-commissioned and will thus cease to be Commissions of the Division.

The ordinary member France commented that work related to logic and philosophy of science in Arabic or more generally in non-European languages are not well represented by the commissions of the Division and that therefore the Commission on Arabic logic is very valuable and should not be discontinued. Karine Chemla expressed willingness to volunteer to find active researchers to continue the work of the commission.

It was proposed to the Assembly that the newly elected Council for the term 2024–2027 should be given the task to revive the Commission on Arabic Logic or, more generally, commissions that work on non-European aspects of logic and philosophy of science and technology and propose to commission them at the General Assembly in 2027, provided that active members for these commissions can be found.

After this discussion, the proposal to commission the mentioned four commissions (and therefore not commission the remaining two) was accepted unanimously by acclamation. CoPhiTES announced their intent to apply to the Division's sister Division DHST to become an inter-division commission.

New commissions

The Executive Committee proposed to commission two new commissions for the term of 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2027: the Commission on Logic Education (steering group: Valentin Goranko, Cathy Kessel, Fenrong Liu, Maria Manzano, and Ram Ramanujam (chair), as well as the Secretary General of DLMPST ex officio). and the IUHPST Commission on Science & Education (steering group: Hanne Andersen, Theodore Arabatzis, Sibel Erduran, Snezana Lawrence, Simon Modeste, Ram Ramanujam, as well as the Second Vice President of DHST and the Secretary General of DLMPST ex officio). Brief descriptions of the scope of these commissions and their steering groups were made available to the delegates in advance.

CoPhiTES suggested expanding the remit of the IUHPST Commission on Science & Education to cover technology and engineering education. Members of the proposed steering group indicated that there is currently no philosopher of technology or the engineering sciences on the steering group; it was suggested to proactively aim to change this; if successful, a name change could be considered at the next General Assembly.

The Assembly unanimously approved the commissioning of the two new commissions with the listed steering groups.

Commission on philosophy of physics

On 21 July 2021, the sister division DHST and the IUPAP (International Union of Pure and Applied Physics) signed a Memorandum of Understanding to create a new Inter-Union Commission on the History and Philosophy of Physics (IUCHPP). As the name suggests, this commission intends to eventually become a DLMPST commission. The Executive Committee was given the mandate to negotiate with DHST and IUCHPP with the aim to create a commission with proper involvement of DHST, DLMPST, IUPAP to be commissioned at the next General Assembly in 2027.

Agenda item 7 Election of the next Council

The Secretary General reported that the preparation of the Council elections was informed by the work of the ad hoc committee on nominations and election (cf. Agenda Item 10). All recommendations of the ad hoc committee (that were in turn based on clear preferences of the membership as established by the membership poll) were implemented in the nominations procedure.

Following the DLMPST tradition, the Nomination Committee consisted of the outgoing Executive Committee. In the case of re-nominations of current members of the outgoing Executive Committee, discussions were held in absence of the concerned person.

On 5 January 2023, the Nomination Committee had invited all member organisations and commissions to submit recommendations for nominations by the deadline of 5 February 2023. In total, forty recommendations were received from a large number of members and commissions.

Officers' Ballot

On the basis of the recommendations, the Nomination Committee first discussed potential nominations for the five officer positions: President, First and Second Vice President, Secretary General, and Treasurer. The Nomination Committee negotiated intensively with a number of candidates and managed to secure a complete ballot for the six officers. All candidates agreed to be nominated and serve in the respective office.
  • PRESIDENT. Valentin Goranko.
  • FIRST VICE PRESIDENT. Sandra Mitchell.
  • SECOND VICE PRESIDENT. Mitsuhiro Okada.
  • SECRETARY GENERAL. Eleonora Cresto.
  • TREASURER. Pierre Édouard Bour.
  • PAST PRESIDENT. Nancy Cartwright.

The Assembly unanimously approved the proposed officers by acclamation.

Assessors' Ballot

The Nominations Committee had received forty recommendations of which three had already agreed to be nominated for the officers' ballot; every remaining recommended candidate was contacted and asked whether they agreed to be nominated for election; of these, 32 candidates agreed to be nominated for election.

In the spirit of avoiding the competitive nature of elections and welcoming the involvement of everyone who is willing to invest time and energy, the Nomination Committee decided that the General Assembly shall elect the assessors on 27 July 2023 by Approval Voting according to the following specifications: Every delegation can vote in favour for every candidate with as many votes (or any part thereof) as they have according to the statutes (e.g., a member with four votes can approve of any given candidate with either 4, 3, 2, 1, or no votes). All candidates who receive approval votes summing up to a strict majority of the validly submitted votes will be elected as assessors (with no upper limit to the number of candidates elected). Should that number be below the statutory minimum number of six, then the six candidates with the highest number of approval votes are elected. Should there be a tie in the process of determining the six highest numbers of votes, all candidates with equal number of approval votes are elected (e.g., if the eight highest vote counts are 80, 70, 60, 55, 40, 40, 40, and 35, then all candidates with at least 40 approval votes will be elected and there will be seven assessors).

The Nomination Committee reminded the Assembly that elected members of Council are not representing members of the Division: they are elected as individuals and have no relation to any of the member organisations. The Nomination Committee also expressed its desire to have disciplinary, geographical, and gender balance in the new Council. While there was no formal mechanisms to enforce such balance via the election procedure, the delegates were requested to keep disciplinary, geographical, and gender balance in their minds as they submit their approval votes. In order to give some indication about discipline and geography, each candidate was asked to indicate their main country of employment and their self-identification as “Logic” (L), “Philosophy of Science & Technology” (P), or both (L+P). It was emphasised that the listing of the main country of employment did not indicate that the ordinary member corresponding to that country was endorsing that candidate. The thirty-two candidates on the ballot were Atocha Aliseda (Mexico, L+P), Matthias Aschenbrenner (Austria, L), Agnes Bolinska (United States of America, P), Christina Brech (Brazil, L), Tim Childers (Czech Republic, P), Leo Corry (Israel, P), Nevia Dolcini (Macau, China, P), Rod Downey (New Zealand, L), Elena Dragalina Chernaya (Russia, L+P), Juliet Floyd (United States of America, L+P), Johanna Franklin (United States of America, L), Valeria Giardino (France, P), Marion Godman (Denmark, P), Inkeri Koskinen (Finland, P), Javier Legris (Argentina, P), Sabina Leonelli (United Kingdom, P), Fenrong Liu (China, L), Ed Mares (New Zealand, L), Genoveva Marti (Spain, L), Peeter Müürsepp (Estonia, P), Rune Nyrup (Denmark, P), Marco Panza (France, P), Rafaele Pisano (France, P), Tomasz Placek (Poland, P), Giuseppe Primiero (Italy, L+P), Ram Ramanujam (India, L), Andrei Rodin (France, L+P), Margaret Schabas (Canada, P), Ralf Schindler (Germany, L), Smita Sirker (India, P), Katie Steele (Australia, P), and Rineke Verbrugge (The Netherlands, L).

The Assembly cast paper ballots. The total number of votes in the Assembly is 98, therefore 50 approval votes constituted a strict majority and a candidate receiving 50 or more approval votes was elected as an assessor according to the voting procedure.

Out of the thirty-two candidates, eight received 50 or more approval votes and were elected as assessors for the term from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2027: Atocha Aliseda (71 approval votes), Agnes Bolinska (52 approval votes), Juliet Floyd (54 approval votes), Valeria Giardino (62 approval votes), Sabina Leonelli (62 approval votes), Fenrong Liu (54 approval votes), Marco Panza (51 approval votes), and Giuseppe Primiero (51 approval votes).

Agenda item 8 Proposed changes of the Statutes of IUHPST

As reported in Agenda item 3., a joint committee composed of representatives of both Divisions had made recommendations for statutory changes for the IUHPST in order to create balance between the Divisions in the governance of the Union. At their General Assembly in 2021, DHST has agreed to changes to the Statutes of IUHPST. In order to have an effect, these changes have to be adopted by both General Assemblies of the two Divisions.

The proposed changes that had already been accepted by DHST had been made available to the delegates in advance and were presented to the Assembly. They consisted of two independent change proposals, as well as a number of editorial corrections: (a) the enlargement of the IUHPST Board from four to six people in order to create symmetry between the Divisions and (b) the appointment of a Gender and Diversity Champion.

The international member Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences expressed opposition to proposal (b). As a consequence, the decision was split into two votes: proposal (a) together with any editorial corrections and proposal (b).

Proposal (a) and the editorial corrections were accepted unanimously by acclamation. There was a paper ballot for proposal (b): 96 votes were cast, 73 in favour of proposal (b), 15 against, 6 abstentions, and 2 invalid votes.

The proposed changes for the IUHPST statutes were therefore adopted by the Assembly and came into effect for the Union immediately. The new text of the statutes can be found in § 6 of this Bulletin.

Agenda item 9 Proposed changes of the Statutes of DLMPST

The Executive Committee recommended a number of changes to the DLMPST statutes. Some of the changes were a codification of current practice into the statutes; the most important change was the possibility of allowing virtual attendance during the General Assembly. The proposed changes were made available to the delegates in advance.

There was a lively discussion of various aspects of the proposed changes and also some basic principles of the statutory structure of the Division. The Secretary General made clear than no changes to the proposed revisions can be voted on at this General Assembly: the Assembly can only accept or reject a proposal that has been made available in advance. Any additional changes will have to be proposed in writing following the statutory rules to a future General Assembly.

The ordinary member France criticised the general membership structure of the Division and the fact that international members have twice the voting power of ordinary members. It was requested that the newly elected Council consider a re-organisation of the membership structure. On behalf of the newly elected Council, the President Elect indicated that the membership structure will be discussed during the next four years.

The President Elect expressed the desire that the Council can call for an extraordinary General Assembly. The Secretary General pointed out that the current statutes allow a majority of the Executive Committee to ask the President to convene an extraordinary General Assembly (Article 12, second sentence).

The international member Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Science requested that the statutes include a statement concerning gender and diversity. It was requested that the newly elected Council consider a corresponding modification of the statutes at the next General Assembly.

After the lively discussion, the changes were unanimously adopted by acclamation. The new text of the statutes can be found in § 5 of this Bulletin.

Agenda item 10 Procedure for Council Nominations

During the 2019 General Assembly, the ordinary member France and the international member Societé de Philosophie des Sciences had made a proposal for a change in the Division's nomination procedures (the proposal is printed in this Bulletin in § 7.1).

As reported in Agenda item 3., the Council had followed up on the proposal to re-consider the Division's nominations procedure by creating an ad hoc committee with the mandate to poll the membership about the various aspects of the proposal. This ad hoc committee submitted a report with a clear recommendation to the Executive Committee in March 2023 (the report is printed in this Bulletin in §§ 7.2 & 7.3).

The Executive Committee had drafted a procedure for nominations, following the recommendations of the ad hoc committee (the description of the procedure is printed in this Bulletin in § 7.4). This procedure had been followed during the nominations process for the elections in this General Assembly (cf. Agenda item 5.). It was proposed to the General Assembly to formally adopt this nomination procedure for future nominations.

The ordinary member France re-emphasised that they disagree with the result of the membership poll and the recommendation of the ad hoc committee and would like to see various aspects of their original proposal implemented (that had been rejected by overwhelming majorities in the membership poll).

Additional comments included the recommendation of the provision of brief biographical statements for all candidates for election as well as further clarification of what the respective roles of the assessors and the officers are. The President Elect stated that these recommendations will be further discussed by the new Council.

There was a request for paper ballots; the Assembly cast paper ballots. There were 97 votes cast, of which 67 were in favour of the procedure, 16 against, 2 abstentions, and 12 invalid ballots. As a consequence, the nomination procedure was adopted.

Agenda item 11 CLMPST XVIII in 2027

The city of Kobe in Japan has submitted a bid to host CLMPST XVIII in 2027 from 23 to 28 August 2027. A written version of the bid had been made available to the delegates. The representatives of Kobe gave a short presentation of their bid during the General Assembly. The Assembly unanimously voted to accept their bid by acclamation.

Agenda item 12 Delegation of responsibilities to the Executive Committee

It was proposed that the General Assembly delegate the following powers to the Executive Committee until the next General Assembly in 2027 according to Article 13 of the statutes:
  • (1) appointing the delegates charged with representing the Division within other international bodies (Article 13, item 2);
  • (2) enacting the General Assembly's decision about the change of responsible institution and membership category of the ordinary member Iran (Article 13, item 5);
  • (3) receiving and considering reports from the Commissions (Article 13, item 7);
  • (4) establishing the programme of activities of the Division for the four years following the General Assembly (Article 13, item 8);
  • (5) fixing the dates of the meetings of the next session (Article 13, item 9);
  • (6) establishing plans for the budget of the Division (Article 13, item 10).

The proposal was accepted unanimously by acclamation.

Agenda item 13 Any other business

None.

The Assembly was adjourned at 7:54pm.

Respectfully submitted,Benedikt Löwe

Secretary-General DLMPST/IUHPST

4 FINANCIAL REPORT

 

Fees from members 2019 2020 2021 2022
Ordinary members
Category A
Austria USD 150.12   USD 319.52 USD 141.51
Belgium USD 139.00 USD 308.92 USD 159.76 USD 141.51
Croatia (member until 2022)   USD 308.92 USD 165.68  
Estonia USD 150.12 USD 154.46 USD 159.76 USD 141.51
Hungary USD 138.87 USD 150.00 USD 150.00 USD 139.37
India USD 138.79 USD 138.23 USD 138.35 USD 139.37
Iran
Eire (member until 2020)
Israel USD 138.81 USD 138.72 USD 137.83  
Moldova (member since 2019)   USD 154.46 USD 137.83 USD 141.51
Norway USD 139.07 USD 154.46 USD 159.76  
Romania     USD 413.72  
Serbia USD 150.12 USD 154.46 USD 159.76 USD 141.51
South Africa   USD 138.98 USD 437.83  
Switzerland USD 150.12 USD 154.46 USD 127.16 USD 141.51
Category B
Argentina USD 300.24   USD 639.04 USD 159.33
Brazil USD 290.00 USD 300.00 USD 281.44 USD 302.76
Czech Republic USD 278.00 USD 308.92 USD 319.53 USD 283.02
Denmark USD 278.85 USD 308.92   USD 566.04
Finland USD 300.24 USD 308.92 USD 319.53 USD 283.02
Mexico (member since 2019)     USD 319.53  
The Netherlands USD 300.24   USD 639.04 USD 283.02
New Zealand   USD 288.26 USD 288.24 USD 289.76
Poland USD 288.85 USD 288.30 USD 288.22 USD 289.65
South Korea USD 288.87 USD 288.30   USD 589.28
Spain USD 300.24 USD 308.92 USD 319.53 USD 283.02
Taiwan USD 288.87 USD 300.00 USD 300.00 USD 300.00
Category C
Australia USD 583.01 USD 581.85 USD 600.00 USD 600.00
Canada USD 600.00 USD 600.00 USD 600.00 USD 600.00
China USD 588.83 USD 587.84 USD 588.71 USD 589.31
Russia (member since 2019) USD 600.00   USD 639.05 USD 589.31
Sweden USD 600.48   USD 1,278.11 USD 566.04
Category D
France USD 1,187.26 USD 247.17 USD 2,345.97 USD 1,132.08
Germany USD 1,200.00 USD 1,200.00 USD 1,278.11 USD 1,132.08
Italy USD 1,200.96 USD 1,235.70 USD 1,278.11 USD 1,132.08
Japan USD 1,200.00 USD 1,200.00 USD 1,200.00 USD 1,200.00
United Kingdom USD 1,200.96 USD 1,163.11 USD 1,163.11 USD 1,164.82
Category E
United States of America USD 2,335.86 USD 2,368.38 USD 2,266.49  
International members
Association Computability in Europe USD 75.06 USD 77.23 USD 79.88 USD 70.75
Association for the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (member since 2019)   USD 77.23 USD 79.88 USD 70.75
Charles Peirce Society     USD 207.00  
Polskie Towarzystwo Logiki i Filozofii Nauki USD 75.06 USD 77.23 USD 79.88 USD 70.75
European Philosophy of Science Association   USD 154.46 USD 159.76 USD 141.51
Scandinavian Logic Society (member since 2019)   USD 77.23 USD 79.88 USD 70.75
Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences (member since 2019)   USD 154.46 USD 159.76 USD 141.51
Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsphilosophie (member since 2019)   USD 154.46 USD 159.76 USD 141.51
FoLLI USD 150.12 USD 154.46 USD 159.76 USD 141.51
Institut Wiener Kreis USD 150.12 USD 154.46 USD 159.76 USD 141.51
Société de Philosophie des Sciences USD 300.24 USD 308.92 USD 319.55 USD 283.02
Association for Symbolic Logic USD 535.87 USD 576.22 USD 576.20 USD 597.95
Total USD 16,793.25 USD 15,818.46 USD 21,839.79 USD 15,334.34
 
Expenses
2019 ICSU/ISC Subscription USD 2,949.02  
  CIPSH Subscription USD 778.40  
  Commissions funding USD 3,001.60  
  Conference support USD 500.40  
  Travel expenses USD 6,194.66  
  Audit fee USD 667.20  
  Bank fees USD 362.86  
  Domain & hosting fees USD 976.58  
  CLMPST 2019 USD 16,124.00  
  Postage USD 61.38  
  Total   USD 31,616.10
2020 ICSU/ISC Subscription —  
  CIPSH Subscription USD 800.92  
  Commissions funding USD 2,013.65  
  Conference support —  
  Travel expenses —  
  Audit fee USD 686.50  
  Bank fees USD 298.94  
  Domain & hosting fees USD 230.09  
  Total   USD 4,030.10
2021 ICSU/ISC Subscription —  
  CIPSH Subscription USD 828.40  
  SCGES Contribution USD 295.86  
  Commissions funding USD 3,024.82  
  Conference support —  
  Travel expenses —  
  Audit fee —  
  Bank fees USD 416.14  
  Domain & hosting fees USD 559.25  
  Total   USD 5,124.47
2022 ICSU/ISC Subscription USD 1,460.17  
  CIPSH Subscription USD 733.75  
  IYBSSD Contribution USD 1,058.70  
  Commissions funding USD 3,052.41  
  Conference support —  
  Travel expenses —  
  Audit fee —  
  Bank fees USD 291.12  
  Domain & hosting fees USD 220.12  
  Reimbursements USD 17.82  
  Total   USD 6,834.09
 
Total assets on December 31
1999 USD 77,418.83 2004 USD 105,138.99 2009 USD 118,854.23 2014 USD 65,502.45
2000 USD 90,768.87 2005 USD 115,061.20 2010 USD 127,909.44 2015 USD 74,162.11
2001 USD 110,776.63 2006 USD 118,918.12 2011 USD 89,509.92 2016 USD 83,186.83
2002 USD 113,071.31 2007 USD 93,332.02 2012 USD 104,098.00 2017 USD 83,514.95
2003 USD 95,691.32 2008 USD 104,185.56 2013 USD 108,625.18 2018 USD 69,786.80
2019 USD 54,058.49 2020 USD 67,345.44 2021 USD 84,950.74 2022 USD 90,308.16
 
Overview (in USD)
  Total assets on 31 December Total annual income Ordinary member dues International members dues Other sources of income Expenses
2019 54,058.49 16,793.25 15,506.78 1,286.47 0.00 31,616.10
2020 67,345.44 16,756.68 13,852.10 1,966.36 938.22 4,030.10
2021 84,950.73 21,839.79 19,618.72 2,221.07 0.00 5,124.47
2022 90,308.16 16,349.29 14,060.74 1,273.58 1,014.97 7,964.02
2023 c. 77,000.– c. 25,000.–       c. 38,000.–
 

 

5 STATUTES OF THE DIVISION OF LOGIC, METHODOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Adopted by the General Assembly of IUHPS/DLMPS; Moscow, August 18, 1987; Article 25 amended by General Assembly of IUHPS/DLMPS, Florence, Italy, August 23, 1995; Articles 9, 13 and 19 amended and new Articles 20 and 21 introduced, raising by 2 the numbering of subsequent articles, by General Assembly of IUHPS/DLMPS, Nancy, France, July 24, 2011; amendments in Articles 1, 2, 5, 12, and 21 by General Assembly of IUHPS/DLMPS, Helsinki, Finland, August 6, 2015; amendments in Articles 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, and 29 and deletion of Article 30 by General Assembly of DLMPST/IUHPST, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 27 July 2023.

I OBJECTIVES

ARTICLE 1

The objectives of the Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology of the International Union of History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, hereinafter designated as the Division, are:
  • 1. to promote contacts among logicians, philosophers of science and technology and scientists interested in the foundational problems of their disciplines, and among institutions dedicated to logic, methodology, and philosophy of science and technology;
  • 2. to encourage and sustain research and study of important problems in logic, methodology, and philosophy of science and technology;
  • 3. to collect documents useful for the development of logic, methodology and philosophy of science and technology;
  • 4. to organize, sponsor, and support international meetings of logic, methodology and philosophy of science and technology (international congresses and symposia), and to publish reports, conference proceedings, and other works related to such meetings;
  • 5. to support the endeavours of teaching logic and philosophy of science and technology at all levels of education and creating awareness and appreciation of logic and philosophy of science and technology in the general public by outreach activities.

ARTICLE 2

The Division is affiliated, through the International Union of History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, to the International Science Council (ISC) for the purpose of achieving its scientific and scholarly objectives and furthering international understanding and cooperation in its field.

II MEMBERSHIP

ARTICLE 3

The Division comprises two kinds of members:
  • 1. Ordinary Members,
  • 2. International Members.

ARTICLE 4

  • (1) An Ordinary Member shall be an academy of sciences, scientific society, national committee or other scientific institution or association of such institutions recognized by the General Assembly of the Division or by a majority of its members. Institutions and committees representing scientific activities in a definite territory or country may be accepted as Ordinary Members, but no country may be represented by more than one Ordinary Member except where the General Assembly decides otherwise.
  • (2) Any country may become and remain affiliated to the Division in the way indicated in Article 4, provided that it observes the requirements of the present Statutes. Each Ordinary Member of the Division creates a Committee for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology which advises the member organization in matters concerning the Division. The Committee shall communicate to the Secretary General of the Division the name of its Chair or Secretary.

ARTICLE 5

An International Member shall be an international body or international scientific organisation; it may become and remain affiliated to the Division provided that it observes the requirements of the present Statutes.

ARTICLE 6

  • (1) The application for either Ordinary or International membership in the Division is made to the Executive Committee which decides whether to accept the applicant as Candidate Member. Candidate members do not have to pay any dues and have no voting rights, but are otherwise treated like members. The Executive Committee recommends to the General Assembly to accept the Candidate member as a member.
  • (2) The General Assembly shall accept or reject the application.
  • (3) The Ordinary Members are classified in five membership categories, A, B, C, D, and E, the International Members are classified in four membership categories, 0, A, B, and C with the corresponding voting powers and annual subscriptions (specified in Articles 10 and 23). The organization which seeks membership in the Division must specify the category which it proposes for its classification. The proposal may be rejected by the members of the Division if it is judged to be manifestly inappropriate. An Ordinary Member may change its classification with the approval of the members of the Division upon recommendation of the Executive Committee.

ARTICLE 7

  • (1) Membership status may be terminated:
    • 1. by a letter of resignation,
    • 2. by exclusion; this must be carried by a majority of two-thirds of the votes cast at the General Assembly on a motion of the Executive Committee and for the following reasons:
      • a. non-payment of subscriptions for three consecutive years;
      • b. absence of scientific activity;
      • c. for serious reasons prejudicial to the interests of the Division.
  • (2)

    The proposal for exclusion may be carried only after inclusion in the agenda of the General Assembly and notification to the member in question at least four months before the General Assembly, and after the General Assembly has heard the explanation of the member, or the member has signified its incapacity by failing to respond to a registered letter mailed at least four months previously.

III ADMINISTRATION AND VOTING RIGHTS

ARTICLE 8

The administrative authority of the Division is exercised by:
  • 1. the General Assembly;
  • 2. the Council;
  • 3. the Executive Committee.

ARTICLE 9

The General Assembly consists of the delegates of the Ordinary and International Members and delegates of the Division's Commissions, including Inter-Division and Inter-Union Commissions.

ARTICLE 10

  • (1)

    The Ordinary and International Members of the Division are classified in six categories, 0, A, B, C, D and E. Ordinary Members cannot be in category 0, International Members cannot be in categories D or E. At the General Assembly, the number of votes accorded to the delegates of each Member depends on its category as follows:

    Category 0 A B C D E
    Ordinary Member x 1 2 3 4 5
    International Member 1 2 4 6 x x
     

     

  • (2) Voting by the General Assembly shall be by delegations, but each delegation may cast its votes either as a unit or divided in a way determined by the delegation. In voting by correspondence, each member casts its vote as a unit, counted as many times as its category indicates.

ARTICLE 11

  • (1) Except where specified to the contrary in the Statutes, the decisions of the General Assembly are taken by a majority of votes recorded. If the number of votes cast for and against a proposal are equal, the President may use a casting vote in addition to any vote which she or he may have as a member of a delegation. Specially stipulated majorities are calculated as proportions of the number of votes recorded.
  • (2) Members of the Council attend sessions of the General Assembly and take part in the discussions but their status as members of the Council gives them no voting right.
  • (3) Delegates are allowed to participate and exercise their voting rights by electronic means of communication, provided that
    • 1. this has been announced when the General Assembly was convened;
    • 2. the arrangements for the use of electronic means of communication were announced when the General Assembly was convened;
    • 3. all delegates can be identified by all participants of the General Assembly during the entire meeting;
    • 4. all delegates can observe the discussions at the meeting; and
    • 5. all delegates can fully participate in the deliberations during the meeting.

ARTICLE 12

The Ordinary General Assembly is convened at least every fourth year by the President in office, normally during an International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology. At the request of a majority of the Ordinary Members or a majority of the Executive Committee, the President shall within six months convene an Extraordinary General Assembly.

ARTICLE 13

  • (1) The ordinary General Assembly of the Division has the following responsibilities:
    • 1. electing the members of the Council and of the Executive Committee;
    • 2. appointing the delegates charged with representing the Division within other international bodies;
    • 3. establishing or dissolving the Commissions of the Division, including Inter-Division or Inter-Union Commissions;
    • 4. accepting new members in the Division. These must have sent their request for affiliation at least six weeks before the date of the meeting of the General Assembly;
    • 5. determining the international or representative character of a group or an organization;
    • 6. receiving and considering reports from the Executive Committee and from the Commissions;
    • 7. establishing the programme of activities of the Division for the four years following the General Assembly;
    • 8. fixing the dates and places of the meetings of the next congress;
    • 9. establishing plans for the budget of the Division and
    • 10. determining the level of the unit of subscription of Ordinary Members as well as the subscriptions of international bodies belonging to the Division;
    • 11. approving the accounts of the Division.
  • (2)

    The General Assembly may create scientific commissions and committees for the Division.

  • (3)

    The General Assembly may delegate to the Council or the Executive Committee a part of its powers for a period not exceeding four years.

ARTICLE 14

The summonses to each General Assembly with the complete agenda must be sent by the Secretary General to all Ordinary and International Members at least four months before the date of the meeting. Any question not appearing on the agenda may not be considered except with the prior assent of two-thirds of the votes cast, or, in the case of a proposal to modify the Statutes of the Union or the Division, of three-quarters of the votes cast.

ARTICLE 15

  • (1) The General Assembly is validly constituted only if delegates possessing at least half of the valid voting power are present.
  • (2) Any Ordinary or International Member may be represented by proxy, provided that due notification of this intention and the name of the delegate are communicated in writing to the Secretary General before the General Assembly.
  • (3) Delegates participating and exercising their voting rights by electronic means of communication as described in Article 11 (3) are considered present for the purposes of Article 15 (1).

ARTICLE 16

The Council consists of the six members of the Executive Committee and at least six assessors.

ARTICLE 17

  • (1) The Executive Committee consists of the President, the First Vice-President, the Second Vice-President, the Secretary General, the Treasurer, and the (immediate) Past President of the Division.
  • (2) The members of the Executive Committee and the Council are elected at a General Assembly to serve in office for a period of four years. They are not eligible for immediate re-election to the same office with the exception of the Secretary General and the Treasurer.
  • (3) In the event that the President of the Division is unable to exercise their functions they are automatically replaced by the First Vice-President, in which case the Second Vice-President acquires the status of the First Vice-President. In the event that the Secretary General or the Treasurer cannot exercise his functions, the President will nominate a person to replace them in their functions and as member of the Council and of the Executive Committee, subject to confirmation of two-thirds of the Council (excluding the member nominated).

ARTICLE 18

  • (1) The Council can establish the rules of procedure for the nominations, elections, and administrative procedures of the Division in conformity with these Statutes. The rules can take effect immediately, but must be ratified by the next General Assembly.
  • (2) The Council is also responsible for ensuring the continuity of the Division's policies and activities in the four-year interval between successive ordinary meetings of the General Assembly.

ARTICLE 19

The Executive Committee is charged with the administration of the Division's business and finance, and with the implementation of the resolutions taken by the General Assembly and the policies of the Council. It is responsible for approving the payment of subsidies to these Commissions. Three members of the Committee, other than the Past President, constitute a quorum.

ARTICLE 20

The Commissions of the Division shall have full freedom in arranging their own internal structure and work within the framework of the Statutes of the Division. If special funds are provided for their use, they may make their own financial arrangements, subject to the approal of the Executive Committee. Each Commission will be entitled to one delegate and one vote at General Assemblies.

ARTICLE 21

The Inter-Division Commissions of the Division include the DHST-DLMPST Joint Commission. The main responsibility of the DHST-DLMPST Joint Commission is to explore research fields of interest both to historians of science and technology, and to logicians and philosophers of science and technology, by means of Joint Conferences and/or symposia. The members of the Joint Commission are the Chair of the Joint Commission, together with each Division's President and Secretary General who serve as ex officio members together with additional members, co-opted by the Joint Commission for a fixed period of time. The Chair of the Joint Commission holds office for two years, and is appointed alternately by the DHST and the DLMPST. The Chair of the Joint Commission appointed by a Division takes up office at the beginning of the calendar year before the international congress of that Division.

IV FINANCE

ARTICLE 22

The revenues of the Division are made up from:
  • 1. subscriptions by Ordinary Members and international organizations;
  • 2. subventions, gifts and legacies, subject to approval by the Executive Committee;
  • 3. the sale of publications.

ARTICLE 23

  • (1)

    Each Ordinary Member pays the Division an annual subscription which depends on its category as follows:

    Category 0 A B C D E
    Number of subscription units ½ 1 2 4 8 16
     

     

  • (2) The level of the unit of subscription is determined by the General Assembly.

ARTICLE 24

Each Ordinary Member is responsible for the payment of the required subscription. If it has not done so for two years preceding the year of the General Assembly, it will not be permitted to vote in that Assembly.

V GENERAL REMARKS

ARTICLE 25

The official domicile of the Division is Montpellier, France.

ARTICLE 26

These Statutes may only be amended by the General Assembly, with the provision that the total number of votes in favour of the change proposed is equal to at least two-thirds of the number of votes cast.

ARTICLE 27

Proposals formulated by a member for amendment of the Statutes of the Union or the Division must be sent to the Secretary General at least five months before the date of the General Assembly at which they will be considered. The Secretary General must bring to the knowledge of all Ordinary and International Members at least four months before the General Assembly, any proposal of this nature that she or he has received.

ARTICLE 28

  • (1) The life of the Division may be terminated only by an Extraordinary General Assembly and with the approval of at least two-thirds of the total number of votes assigned to the Ordinary and International Members and Commissions.
  • (2) In the event of dissolution the assets of the Division shall be transferred to an international organization having activities similar to those of the Division.

ARTICLE 29

Any Ordinary or International Member which leaves the Division automatically forfeits all rights and privileges of membership.

6 STATUTES OF IUHPST

These statutes were approved by the General Assembly of DHST held virtually on 31 July 2021 and the General Assembly of DLMPST in Buenos Aires on 27 July 2023.

Historical Note

This historical note does not form part of the statutes.

The creation of the International Union of History and Philosophy of Science (IUHPS) resulted from the merger in 1956 between the International Union of the History of Science (UIHS), established in October 1947 (constitutive General Assembly, Lausanne), and the International Union of Philosophy of Science (UIPS), established in October 1949 (constitutive General Assembly, Paris). These two organizations became respectively the Division of History of Science (DHS) and the Division of Philosophy of Sciences (DPS). The former subsequently became the Division of History of Science and Technology (DHST; General Assembly, Beijing 2005); the latter subsequently became the Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (DLMPS) and then the Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology (DLMPST; General Assembly, Helsinki 2015). The Statutes of the IUHPS were ratified by the IUHS General Assembly in September 1956 (Florence-Milan), and by the IUPS General Assembly in September 1958 (Brussels). Then, after preparatory work undertaken by the Executive Committees and General Assemblies of the two Divisions, the Board of the IUHPS, during its meeting of 29 September 1961 (London), decided to entrust the drafting of new Statutes to of a Committee composed of Prof. S. C. Kleene (representing DLMPS) and Prof. M. Clagett (representing DHS). This project revised by the Executive Committees of the two Divisions, was approved by the General Assembly of the DLMPS (24–26 August 1962, Helsinki) and the General Assembly of the DHS (August 26–September 2, 1962, Ithaca NY). The new Statutes of the IUHPS were implemented on 1st January 1963.

At its general assembly in Beijing (2005), the DHS was renamed to Division of History of Science and Technology (DHST); the DLMPS added the words “and Technology” to its name at the general assembly in Helsinki (2015). In 2012 and 2013, the councils of the two divisions agreed on a Memorandum on the Cooperation between the divisions. Between 2013 and 2015, a committee consisting of Prof. E. Sober, Prof. P. Schroeder-Heister, Prof. B. Löwe (representing DLMPS) and Prof. E. Nicolaidis, Prof. C. Jami, and Prof. M. Osborne (representing DHST) revised these Statutes according to the guidelines given in the Memorandum. They were approved by the General Assembly of DLMPST in Helsinki on 6 August 2015 and by the General Assembly of DHST in Rio de Janeiro on 26 July 2017. In 2023, a minor update of the Statutes was implemented. The changes were accepted by the DHST General Assembly in Prague (held virtually) on 31 July 2021 and the DLMPST General Assembly in Buenos Aires on 27 July 2023.

Objectives of the Union

Article 1

The objectives of the International Union of History and Philosophy of Science and Technology (IUHPST), hereinafter designated as “the Union”, are:
  • 1. To establish and reinforce links between historians and philosophers of science and between the institutions, societies, journals etc. devoted to these or related disciplines;
  • 2. To collect documents useful for the development of the history of science and technology and for logic, methodology and philosophy of science;
  • 3. To take all measures deemed necessary or useful for the development, spread and organization of studies and research in the fields of history of science and technology, logic, methodology and philosophy of science and technology and related disciplines;
  • 4. To organize international congresses on the History of Science and Technology and on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology, as well as other international events;
  • 5. To contribute to maintaining the unity of science in general and to the establishment of links between different branches of human knowledge;
  • 6. To foster contacts and exchanges among historians, philosophers, and scholars concerned with issues related to the methods and foundations of their respective disciplines.

Article 2

The Union is affiliated to the International Council for Science (ICSU). It strives to cooperate with the other unions that are part of ICSU, with a view to reaching the scientific goals and the international understanding which they all pursue.

Composition of the Union

Article 3

The Union consists of two divisions: the Division of History of Science and Technology (hereafter DHST) and the Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology (hereafter DLMPST).

Article 4

Each of these two divisions has its own statutes. These specify the details of the activities and composition of these divisions. The statutes of both divisions supplement and form an integral part of the present Statutes of the Union.

Administration

Article 5

The administrative authority of the Union is exercised by:
  • 1. The general assemblies of both divisions;
  • 2. The councils of both divisions;
  • 3. The Board of the Union.

Article 6

The respective general assemblies and councils of the two divisions are regulated by the respective statutes of these divisions.

Article 7

  • 1. The Board of the Union consists of the President, the Vice President, the Secretary General, the Treasurer, and two additional members.The offices of the Board are filled on a four-year cycle described in Article 7.3 and 7.4, starting on 1 January 2016.
  • 2. In addition to the officers of the Board, each of the two divisions can appoint a member of their council as the official ISC contact person. The Board appoints a Gender and Diversity Champion, who shall work to promote equality, diversity and inclusion, and oversee the implementation of best practices in the Union. The Gender and Diversity Champion is invited to all Board meetings and discussions.
  • 3. During the first two calendar years of the cycle (i.e., every year divisible by four and the immediately following year), the president, secretary general and treasurer of the DHST are President, Secretary General and Treasurer of the Union, respectively. The president of the DLMPST is Vice President of the Union. The secretary general and the treasurer of DLMPST are the additional two members of the Board of the Union mentioned in Article 7.1.
  • 4. During the third and fourth calendar years of the cycle (i.e., every even year not divisible by four and the immediately following year), the president, secretary and treasurer of the DLMPST are President, Secretary General and Treasurer of the Union, respectively. The president of the DHST is Vice President of the Union. The secretary general and the treasurer of DHST are the additional two members of the Board of the Union mentioned in Article 7.1.
  • 5. The division whose treasurer is the Treasurer of the Union in any given calendar year acts as the treasurer of the Union with respect to the ISC fees.

Article 8

All decisions made by the Board of the Union require the agreement of the majority of its members, including at least one from each division. The President of the Union may, with the approval of the Vice President and the assistance of the secretaries general of the two Divisions, call for a vote, typically in electronic form, on any question.

Article 9

  • 1. Each of the two divisions shall have its own financial regulations, defined by its own statutes.
  • 2. Each division is responsible for the funds entrusted to it and writes financial reports according to their own statutes.
  • 3. The Union can apply for grants from funding bodies as decided by the Board; if the Union receives grants, the Board decides in each individual case how these grants are handled financially.

Article 10

The presidents and secretaries general of the two divisions shall send the Secretary General of the Union all information on the scientific activity of their respective divisions, to enable her or him to respond at any time to questionnaires received from UNESCO, ICSU or all other international organizations to which the Union has institutional relations.

Article 11a

  • 1. The Union maintains a Joint Commission in order to enhance cooperation between them. The main responsibility of the Joint Commission is to explore research fields of mutual interest to historians and philosophers of science and technology and logicians by means of joint conferences and symposia on topics of mutual interest.
  • 2. Details about the organization of the Joint Commission are regulated by an agreement between the divisions.
  • 3. The Joint Commission organizes a session at the international congresses of each of the two divisions on a topic of interest for the other division.

Article 11b

  • 1. Each division invites a delegate of the other division to their physical council or executive committee meetings. The costs of the trip are covered by the division sending the delegate.
  • 2. Each division sends a representative to the congress organized by the other division. The representative attends the council meetings and meetings of the general assembly of the other division and delivers words of greeting from the sister division either in the opening session or during the meeting of the general assembly.
  • 3. The hosting division will cover the registration fee and the accommodation expenses of this representative.

Generalities

Article 12

These Statutes may be amended only by general assemblies convened by each division, provided that the total number of votes cast in favour of the proposed amendment in each division is at least equal to two-thirds the number of votes cast in that division.

Article 13

Proposals made by a member, scientific section, or commission of one of the divisions to amend the Statutes must be received in writing by the Secretary General of the Union at least five months before the date of the first general assembly during which they are to be examined. The secretaries general of both divisions shall inform all members, scientific sections, and commissions of their division of any proposal they have received in accordance with the statutes of that division.

Article 14

The councils of both divisions can jointly decide to implement rules of procedure of the Union in accordance with the present Statutes.

Article 15

Under these Statutes, the Union shall continue to operate without any limitation of time. The duration of the Union is unlimited, unless dissolved according to the provisions laid down in the present article. The dissolution of the Union can be approved by a joint General Assembly of both divisions called for that purpose. The resolution of dissolution is valid only if it is approved by at least three-quarters of the votes in each of the divisions. In case of dissolution, the assets of the Union shall be passed on to an international organization with activities similar to those of the Union.

Article 16

In the event that a member, scientific section, or commission of one of the divisions ceases its affiliation with the division, it retains no right on the assets of the Union.

7 PAPERS CONCERNING THE PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE COUNCIL NOMINATIONS PROCEDURE

7.1 The 2019 proposal

The following proposal was sent to Council on 6 August 2019 by the ordinary member France and the international member Societé de Philosophie des Sciences.

‘‘The Council can establish the rules of procedure for the administrative procedures of the Division in conformity with these Statutes. The rules can take effect immediately, but must be ratified by the next General Assembly.

A Nomination Committee will be in charge of preparing the elections to elect the next Council. The Nomination Committee will consist of five colleagues belonging to five different members of the Division. Six months before the Congress, the Council shall ask members of the DLMPST to nominate potential members of the Nomination Committee. The Nomination Committee will, then, be elected by the General Assembly, on the basis of the received nominations. Two years [or 18 months] before the next Congress, the Nomination Committee will ask members of the DLMPST to suggest possible candidates for the elections of the next Council. On this basis, the Nomination Committee will prepare a slate for the elections at the next General Assembly, with at least two candidates per office. The slate should respect gender, geographic, disciplinary and other important balances. The criteria for all nominations should include scientific excellence and significant range of services to the community; additional, more specific criteria might be indicated by the Nomination Committee itself.

The Council is also responsible for ensuring the continuity of the Division's policies and activities in the four-year interval between successive ordinary meetings of the General Assembly.’’

7.2 Report by the ad hoc committee

The following report was submitted by the ad hoc committee on DLMPST nomination and election policy to the Executive Committee in March 2023.

The DLMPST ad hoc committee on nominations was created on 18 March 2022. Its members were Verónica Becher, Chen Bo, Jen Davoren, Valeria Giardino, Benedikt Löwe, and Alasdair Urquhart, and the task of the committee was to poll the membership about the nomination procedure for Council elections and make a recommendation to Council.

The committee considered both the status quo and the proposed changes submitted by two members to Council in July 2019. It structured the proposal into four areas of potential change: (A) the composition of the nomination committee, (B) the selection procedure for the nomination committee, (C) the tradition on contested elections, and (D) the administrative status of the nomination and election policy. The committee designed a questionnaire that listed for each of the four areas the status quo, the proposal, and possibly an intermediate position, as well as the Council recommendation. The questionnaire can be found in § 7.3.

This questionnaire was sent to the membership and the commissions on 3 February 2023 with a submission deadline of 28 February 2023. By the deadline, seventeen members and three commissions had replied. These members and commissions represented a total voting power of 46 votes in the General Assembly (out of a total of 110 votes) and the results of the poll are given in the following table.

  votes percent voting power percent
A1 14 70% 32 70%
A2 4 20% 9 20%
A3 2 10% 5 10%
B1 11 55% 27 59%
B2 9 45% 19 41%
B3 0 0% 0 0%
C1 18 90% 41 89%
C2 2 10% 5 11%
D1 0 0% 0 0%
D2 20 100% 46 100%
D3 0 0% 0 0%
 

 

There was very strong to overwhelming support for options A1, C1, and D2:
  • A1 In favour of keeping the status quo (the outgoing Executive Committee is the nomination committee, possibly supplemented with additional people to increase coverage).
  • C1 In favour of keeping the status quo, i.e., contested elections will only take place if there are two candidates willing to serve in the same office.
  • D2 In favour of a written description of the rules of procedure that is confirmed by the General Assembly and is binding until the General Assembly decides to change them.
There was a preference of option B1 over B2 but a large minority of votes for B2:
  • B1 In favour of keeping the status quo, i.e., additional members of the nomination committee are coopted by the Executive Committee.
  • B2 In favour of an informal procedure that allows members to propose additional members of the nomination committee.
In light of the poll results, the ad hoc committee makes the following recommendations:
  • (1) That the Executive Committee compose a proposed nomination procedure to be submitted to the General Assembly in Buenos Aires, adopted by the General Assembly, and to remain binding for future Executive Committees until the General Assembly decides to change the procedure;
  • (2) That said description stipulate a nomination committee that primarily consists of the members of the outgoing Executive Committee, possibly supplemented with additional members;
  • (3) That said description foresee contested elections for offices or seats on the Council only in the case that the number of candidates exceeds the number of people who can serve in that capacity; in particular, that there be no obligation for the nomination committee to search for additional candidates in order to have contested elections;
  • (4) That said description give the membership some informal opportunity to suggest additional members of the nomination committee to be coopted by the outgoing Executive Committee.

7.3 The questionnaire submitted to the membership

A Composition of the nomination committee

  • Status quo. During the last sixty years, the nomination committee was usually the outgoing Executive Committee, sometimes supplemented with (very few) additional people to increase geographical or subject coverage. Members of the outgoing Executive Committee do not have a conflict of interest since they are not re-electable to the same office by our Statutes (Article 17) and there has been a tradition that immediate past officers are usually not nominated for other offices.
  • Proposal. It was proposed to have a nomination committee separate from the outgoing Executive Committee.
  • Council recommendation. In practice, the main task of the nomination committee is to discuss the workload and tasks of the officers with potential nominees: many candidates are reluctant to be nominated and wish to have an in-depth discussion with past office holders to understand the commitment. As a consequence, Council strong recommends to include the outgoing Executive Committee in the nomination committee (answer options A1 or A2).
  • Answer options.
    • A1 In favour of keeping the status quo (the outgoing Executive Committee is the nomination committee, possibly supplemented with additional people to increase coverage).
    • A2 In favour of a mixed nomination committee with an approximately balanced number of members of the outgoing Executive Committee and additional members.
    • A3 In favour of a nomination committee formally independent of the outgoing Executive Committee.

B Selection procedure for the nomination committee

  • Status quo. During the last sixty years, there was no formal procedure to select the members of the nomination committee. The members of the outgoing Executive Committee decided whether they felt that cooption of additional members was required or not and selected the coopted members.
  • Proposal. It was proposed to have a nomination process for the nomination committee as well as an election of the members of the nomination committee at the previous General Assembly (i.e., four years before the election prepared by the nomination committee).
  • Council recommendation. Council strongly recommends against formal procedures that require many years of preparation or create unnecessary bureaucratic overload. Council believes that formal procedures like this will increase the inflexibility of DLMPST. Council therefore recommends to keep the policy as informal as possible (answer options B1 or B2).
  • Answer options.
    • B1 In favour of keeping the status quo, i.e., additional members of the nomination committee are coopted by the Executive Committee.
    • B2 In favour of an informal procedure that allows members to propose additional members of the nomination committee.
    • B3 In favour of a formal nomination and election procedure for additional members of the nomination committee.

C Contested elections

  • Status quo. During the last sixty years, DLMPST had virtually never contested elections. Each office would have one nominee and every nominee gets elected. Note that the Statutes keep the number of assessors (Council members without offices) flexible, so if there are more nominees than expected, this can be accommodated by increasing the size of Council. Note furthermore that there was never an explicit policy to avoid contested elections: DLMPST would have been prepared to have a contested election if there are two nominations for the same office; however, this has not happened for decades.
  • Proposal. It was proposed to enforce contested elections by giving the nomination committee the mandate to nominate at least two nominees for each office.
  • Council recommendation. Council strongly recommends against a policy that will enforce contested elections without need. The current policy guarantees that everyone who would like to engage in the governance of DLMPST will be able to. Council notes that it is extremely difficult to find nominees for the more time-consuming offices (e.g., President, Secretary, or Treasurer); many nominees are only willing to stand if no one else is interested and would withdraw their nomination if a second nominee is found. Council recommends answer option C1.
  • Answer options.
    • C1 In favour of keeping the status quo, i.e., contested elections will only take place if there are two candidates willing to serve in the same office.
    • C2 In favour of a mandate for the nomination committee to enforce that there are at least two nominees for each office.

D Administrative status of the nomination and election policy

  • Status quo. The Statutes (Article 18) allow Council to establish rules of procedure for nominations and elections. In the past, these were never formally determined in writing in advance. Instead, Council would decide on the procedure, report on it to the General Assembly, and get confirmation from the General Assembly afterwards. The procedure followed was then described and documented in the minutes.
  • Proposal. It has been proposed to codify the nomination and election policy in the Statutes of DLMPST.
  • Council recommendation. Council strongly recommends against creating inflexibility by writing rules of procedure into the Statutes, given that changing the Statutes is a process that takes at least eight years. Written rules of procedure can be confirmed by the General Assembly and are binding until the General Assembly decides to change them. Council recommends answer option D2.
  • Answer options.
    • D1 In favour of keeping the status quo, i.e., no written rules of procedure.
    • D2 In favour of a written description of the rules of procedure that is confirmed by the General Assembly and is binding until the General Assembly decides to change them.
    • D3 In favour of changing the DLMPST Statutes by specifying the rules of procedure for nominations and elections in the Statutes.

7.4 DLMPST Nomination Procedure

The following proposal for a DLMPST nomination procedure was formulated on the basis of the recommendations of the ad hoc committee, submitted to the Executive Committee on 24 May 2023, and endorsed by the Executive Committee in June 2023 for proposal to the General Assembly. It was accepted by the General Assembly and is valid until the General Assembly decides to change it.

A Preamble: Statutory regulations

  • A.1. DLMPST has six Officers: the President, the First and Second Vice President, the Secretary General, the Treasurer, and the Past President. The six officers form the Executive Committee of DLMPST (Statutes, Article 17, Paragraph 1). The office of Past President is not an elected office: the person serving as President in the previous term automatically becomes Past President.
  • A.2. We shall refer to the Secretary General and the Treasurer as Executive Officers. We shall refer to the five officers other than the Past President as Elected Officers. Officers, except for the two executive officers, are not eligible for re-election in the same office (Statutes, Article 17, Paragraph 2).
  • A.3. The Council consists of the six officers and at least six Assessors. The term “assessor” comes from the Latin adsessor, i.e., person who sits on Council in addition to the officers; it does not imply any task involving assessment.

B Preamble: Election traditions

  • B.1. The following description is based on the outcome of the seventeen elections between 1960 and 2019. In these elections, 57 different individuals were elected as officers and 105 different individuals were elected as assessors (ignoring the category of “alternate assessors” that existed until 1991). The information in this Preamble is purely descriptive and has no normative force.
  • B.2. While it is consistent with the statutes to elect a current officer to a different office, this has not been the tradition in DLMPST. Of the 57 individuals elected to offices, only seven have served in two offices: one of them was a Vice President who became President upon the passing of the President (according to Statutes, Article 17, Paragraph 3); another one was a Secretary General who also served as Acting Treasurer and was them re-elected as Treasurer in the following election; the other five were elected to their second office at least one term after leaving Council.
  • B.3. While it is consistent with the statutes to re-elect a former assessor a second time as assessor, this has not been the tradition in DLMPST. Of the 105 individuals elected to Council, only three have served more than one term as assessor.
  • B.4. In contrast, former assessors have been elected to offices: 13 of the 105 individuals elected as assessors have later served in one of the offices of DLMPST, in some cases immediately following their term as assessor.
  • B.5. It is a tradition of DLMPST that the office of President alternates between the fields of logic and philosophy of science and technology.

8 The Nomination Committee

  • 1.1. The Nomination Committee is the outgoing Executive Committee, possibly supplemented by additional members to increase the scope of expertise.
  • 1.2. Approximately ten months before the election, the Executive Committee shall invite the members and commissions to make informal recommendations for additional members of the Nomination Committee. The Executive Committee then decides on the exact composition of the Nomination Committee on the basis of these recommendations and the scope of expertise present in the Executive Committee.

9 Recommendation and Nomination Process

  • 2.1. The Nomination Committee commences its work approximately eight months before the election. Its first task is the discussion of re-nomination of the two executive officers (Secretary General and Treasurer). The Nomination Committee determines whether they are willing to serve for another term; if so, the Nomination Committee shall discuss and decide on their re-nomination in absence of the officers concerned.
  • 2.2. Approximately seven months before the election, the Nomination Committee requests informal recommendations for nominations from all members and commissions. The members and commissions shall be given one month for submission of these recommendations. Members and commissions are not restricted in their recommendations, but can recommend any individual that they consider appropriate for serving on Council. Recommendations are made without specifying any recommended office. All members of the Nomination Committee can add additional recommendations to this list during the process.
  • 2.3. Approximately six months before the election, the Nomination Committee starts to fill the Officers' Ballot with at least one candidate for each of the five positions as Elected Officers. Note that 2.1. potentially generated up to two nominations for the offices of Secretary General and Treasurer. The Nomination Committee considers the entire list of recommendations generated in 2.2. and identifies likely candidates for the remaining offices that do not have nominations yet. The Nomination Committee negotiates with these individuals and asks them whether they are willing to be nominated for the proposed office.
  • 2.4. The Nomination Committee is under no obligation to nominate more than one individual for any office. If more than one person is nominated to any given office, the General Assembly will elect one of the nominees to that office; if exactly one person is nominated, the General Assembly will confirm the nomination by a vote.
  • 2.5. Once the Officers' Ballot is determined, the Nomination Committee decides on the list of nominees for the positions as assessor. They shall consider all names from the recommendation list produced in 2.2., possibly augmented by additional names to maintain balance in gender, geography, or research fields. The Nomination Committee is not obliged to take any recommendation into account. All candidates considered for nomination shall be contacted to confirm that they are willing to be nominated and serve. The Assessors' Ballot consists of all nominees for the position of assessor.

10 Election

  • 3.1. The Nomination Committee proposes reasonable voting procedures for both the Officers' Ballot and the Assessors' Ballot. These voting procedures shall
    • (i) encourage active engagement of as many individuals as possible;
    • (ii) guarantee that all offices are filled and at least six assessors are elected;
    • (iii) aim at balance of gender, geography, and research field within both the Executive Committee and Council.
  • 3.2.

    Both the Officers' Ballot and the Assessors' Ballot, as well as the description of the voting procedures, are distributed to the delegates of the members and commissions at the General Assembly with the other papers approximately one month before the General Assembly, allowing the delegates to prepare for the election at the General Assembly.